Duration: 05:14 minutes Upload Time: 07-07-08 20:54:17 User: Stylemasterr :::: Favorites :::: Top Videos of Day |
|
Description: Nothing Natural About Nature Pt 2 |
|
Comments | |
violetstorm45 ::: Favorites OK. In ur 1st video I was KINDA feelin u. This video is just a waste of time. For u and us... I'm in college hon, I took biology 101, and in high school I aced biology. I don't need a biology lesson, and I'm sure that they are many who feel the same. 07-09-01 06:41:56 __________________________________________________ | |
Stylemasterr ::: Favorites judging the comments, i would say alot of them do need a lesson. this vid is to get everyone whos not caught up to get caught up so we can discuss issues without having to readdress basic bio knowledge. Debate 101. and i'm a college grad. 2 times over. if that means anything. (not really) 07-09-01 19:31:46 __________________________________________________ | |
Stylemasterr ::: Favorites Yeah the animations were great. thats why i used them. but mine came from university vids. meg prolly got them from there. you think too literally. unclench your asscheeks a lil and unlock the shackles you put on your right hemisphere. the ?s were not answered. they prcesses where described but not explained. molecfular detection self repair and atomic communication suggest that there is an underlying lifeforce governing DNA action. check my next vid "its for dummies" it goes further 07-08-17 20:15:36 __________________________________________________ | |
superfisto ::: Favorites Much of what you said made me cringe. Your DNA questions are all answered in molecular bio course. Or you can go to the youtuber's videos from whom you stole the animation. 07-08-17 08:39:39 __________________________________________________ | |
nicholasjc2000 ::: Favorites excellent video. did you custom make your graphics? also, i was wondering what your thoughts are on mutation in the oocyte or sperm. It is my understanding that these cells have less of an ability to repair damaged DNA. Forgive me though if I sound ignorant, I'm a medical technologist and my background into genetics isn't very extensive. 07-08-03 18:18:43 __________________________________________________ | |
superfisto ::: Favorites No. He stole teh graphics from another youtuber. I'm subscribed her her, meg something. 07-08-17 08:38:29 __________________________________________________ | |
LeGioNoFZioN ::: Favorites great job -- Stylemasterr ... I'm no atheist, and need no convincing but you had some points that worked. you will never prove the existance of a supreme or divine being but you do poke a lot of holes in arguments Athiests make 07-07-23 11:55:05 __________________________________________________ | |
cryptographix ::: Favorites What hole? 07-08-11 19:14:38 __________________________________________________ | |
Stylemasterr ::: Favorites this is a chapter in a series. i have to build my case 1st. i will crystallize everything at a later time. I'm trying to use the Socratic method (asking questions to teach) it seems the only way to get through that iron wall Atheists put up. 07-07-14 04:10:09 __________________________________________________ | |
mindwis3 ::: Favorites Hi Stylemaster, you state: "asking questions seems the only way to get through that iron wall Atheists put up" Being an atheist, i can assure you that peer reviewed scientific work is what atheists really like. You know, stuff like : Proof, observation, prediction, reproducability. It's fine that you want to see 'devinity' in mutation, however, it's not founded on anything but belief. cryptographix has an excelent rebuttal. 07-07-14 16:46:38 __________________________________________________ |
Thursday, October 11, 2007
God Atheism Logic Fallacy Evolution Nature Religion pt 2
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment